Language Editing Sample

The thesis editing service of language editing service makes sure to work on minor as well as major errors in your research document as it has already been mentioned on our Phd thesis editing service page.

In the given edited sample, our team has edited the language and grammar used in a technical paper, developed to define the implementation process as well as to draw the comparison between Bi-Modal Dynamic Branch Prediction and Static Branch Prediction Schemes.

It is a 19-page long technical paper including the abstract and final work-cited references. The number of references is 34, which could be the reason for the shorter length of the research document as well. The citation style is APA as it is the most commonly accepted citation in various countries and academic domains.

As you can see, the title of the technical paper is Implementation and Comparison of Bi-Modal Dynamic Branch Prediction With Static Branch Prediction schemes and it consists of 6 chapters along with abstract and references. The chapters include:

• Introduction: The introduction part consists of most of the theoretical part as it states the brief about the research, the problem statement, the schemes as well as their contributions and thus, needed the language editing the most to keep the content concise and focused.
• Related Work: Next comes the mention of related studies conducted on this topic, the major findings and features of those works, and how the current study has a different aim or objective.
• The Dynamic Branch Prediction: This chapter contains the description and method of dynamic branch prediction. It also talks about the predictions made for the experiments and results.
• Experimental Framework: This chapter majorly defines the simulation experiments, set benchmarks, and benchmark statistics to provide the experimental framework. Due to this, it mainly had errors regarding language, spelling and a few jargons.
• Simulation Results: In the results chapter, the branch prediction or misprediction performance has been provided. It also had minor errors regarding the grammar and language because mostly content was the direct interpretation of the graphical representations added in it.
• Conclusion and Future Scope: Lastly, the conclusion and future scope description is provided within three paragraphs and does not have many errors because of direct content and easy language usage.

The abstract and references part have no errors because of no addition of experimental or opinionistic views directly added by the researcher and also because the content in these segments does not have a lot of scope of making conceptual or language errors.